Side by side
| Dimension | Venoly | Revolt |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | Security-first community chat | Open-source community chat |
| Inspectable security-policy engine | Venilator (.vnl → sandboxed VM) | None |
| Hash-chained audit + message provenance | Cipher + Warden | None |
| Behavioral anti-abuse + login risk scoring | Aegis + Sentinel | Basic spam controls |
| Encryption | At rest (Vault) + de-identification | In transit / at rest (no E2EE by default) |
| Trackers / ads | None | None |
| Jurisdiction / data | EU, GDPR-first | Community / varies |
| Federated / decentralized | No | No |
| Self-hostable | Server stack | Yes |
| AI characters as members | Yes (presence + memory) | Bots |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Price | Free + optional plans + Boosts | Free |
Where they lead (honest take)
Revolt leads on being fully open source, community-run, lightweight, and free to self-host.
Venoly’s edge is the security layer — an inspectable policy VM (Venilator), hash-chained integrity (Cipher + Warden), behavioral anti-abuse (Aegis + Sentinel), and an EU/privacy-first posture — wrapped in a familiar community app. These are different priorities, not a strict better-or-worse. Venoly uses encryption at rest (not end-to-end) and is not federated; we state that plainly.
